The Syrian Kurds have failed to get support from the United States and Russia to have an independent delegation for the upcoming Geneva II Syrian peace conference, slated to begin on January 22. They now fear that the Kurdish issue will be ignored in the conference, despite the fact that Kurds control a significant part of northern Syria, including many oil-producing areas.
At first it was unclear if the Syrian Kurdish political organizations could solve their differences, which have been exacerbated by tension between Kurdish groups in Iraq and Turkey. Competition between Kurdistan Democratic Party leader Massoud Barzani, the president of the Kurdistan region of Iraq, and the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), the main Kurdish party in Turkey, over the leadership of the Kurds, were at the core of the differences between Kurdish parties in Syria.
Regional Kurdish Disputes
The PKK backs the powerful Syrian Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) and it’s armed wing, the People’s Defense Units (YPG), that control significant parts of the Kurdish areas in Syria. Its main rival, the Kurdish National Council (KNC), which brings together several Kurdish parties, is backed by Barzani.
Since 2011, the PYD has become the largest Kurdish party in Syria, as a result of its military power through the YPG. The KNC, on the other hand, has been increasingly marginalized as a result of its corresponding lack of military influence. Its leadership is now based outside of Syria and it has affiliated itself with the National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, Syria’s main exile leadership, which is endorsed by several Western and Arab nations, as well as by the PKK’s and PYD’s main enemy, Turkey.
As I have previously written at Al Monitor, the KDP and PKK managed to solve some of their differences in December 2013, and they agreed that the Syrian Kurds should have a united voice in Geneva II as part of an independent Kurdish delegation. However, the National Coalition and several influential foreign nations have opposed the idea of a separate Kurdish delegation. In the end, it appears that only the Kurdish National Council (KNC) will go to Geneva II, as part of the National Coalition’s delegation—assuming the conference is held and the National Coalition attends—while the PYD is left out entirely.
PYD's Plan for Kurdish Transitional Rule
The PYD argues that if the Kurds do not have an independent delegation at the Geneva II talks, there will be no recognition of special status for the Kurds in Syria. There is historical precedent for such fears, considering how the Kurdish national tragedy began in the 1920s. The PYD-leader Saleh Muslim Mohammed has warned of a repetition of the 1923 treaty of Lausanne that created a Turkish state and ignored the option of Kurdish independence that had been promised in the earlier treaty of Sèvres in 1920.
Ultimately, the PYD seeks international recognition for its plan to form a transitional Kurdish government in northern Syria, similar to the autonomous Kurdish Regional Government in Iraq. The West has so far opposed this idea, and it has been harshly criticized by the National Coalition. But for the PYD and many Syrian Kurds, it is of crucial importance. Having their own delegation at the talks would have allowed the PYD to raise this demand and bargain for its approval in the proceedings.
Turning the PYD Against Geneva
“There is frustration towards Washington, Moscow, and the UN,” says the Washington-based Kurdish affairs specialist Mutlu Civiroglu, who argues that Syrian Kurds now feel left out of the Geneva II process. “To provide the Kurdish point of view, Kurds should be there and they should be allowed to speak and raise their own demands. The Kurds have stopped radicals, protected their own areas, and protected ethnic minorities. Not allowing Kurds to come [in a separate Kurdish delegation], means that they want Kurds to live the same life as they did during Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s rule before the revolution.”
At the end of the day, the YPG is the clearly dominant military power in Syrian Kurdistan and the Geneva conference will not change the reality on the ground. Even the KNC realizes that the Kurdish issue will most likely not be discussed during Geneva II, and the PYD and its affiliates are turning hostile to the entire process.
On January 16, a pan-Kurdish body controlled by the PKK said that since the Geneva II meeting is “ostracizing” Syrian Kurds, its outcome “will not be recognized by the Kurds.” This hardening of the PKK’s position didn’t take long to filter down to its affiliates in Syria. Earlier on Monday, a PYD-affiliated organization threatened the KNC by saying that if it goes to Geneva without trying to secure “well-deserved Kurdish rights,” this “will be considered high treason against the Kurdish people and against all of Syria.”
It seems that after its demand for a separate Kurdish delegation was refused, the PYD has now decided to reject the Geneva II meeting entirely.
Wladimir van Wilgenburg is a contributor to Al-Monitor and a political analyst specializing in Kurdish politics.
Comments(5)
I noted two sentences, the first, 'They [Kurds] now fear that the Kurdish issue will be ignored in the conference, despite the fact that Kurds control a significant part of northern Syria, including many oil-producing areas,' and the second, 'At the end of the day, the YPG is the clearly dominant military power in Syrian Kurdistan and the Geneva conference will not change the reality on the ground.' Rejection by the Free Syrian Army, the Islamic Front, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, and Jabhat al-Nusra—which control all territory held by the Syrian opposition—have made Geneva II irrelevant. What interests the Kurds?
Austin – I wouldn't say Geneva is irrelevant. It will not produce any major results now and it might fail entirely, but that in itself is an important signal to the actors in the conflict. All parties have accorded the process importance and been careful to position themselves in relation to the conference (even if only to oppose and undermine it), and many fear being excluded from future peace efforts. So it matters, even if mostly in a negative sense. For the Kurds, the PYD's demand for a separate delegation would have a double effect: involving PYD in peace talks, and establishing the precedent of separate Kurdish delegations. For good or bad, that would have affected diplomacy in the future. Now, the PYD's apparent attempts to withdraw "Kurdish legitimacy" from the Geneva II process seems like a way of demonstrating their ability to act as a spoiler if their interests are ignored. Their success or failure at this, too, will be registered by other actors.
Mr. Lund, I meant that groups involved in the Syrian Civil War, such as the PYD, may be overstating the importance accorded to Geneva II. What does a political solution, maybe possible through Geneva II, matter when the YPG has achieved and will continue to achieve a military solution? I could say the same for the Syrian government and most of the Syrian opposition, both of which expect not political but military victory.
Thank you Wladimir for your informative piece on the Kurdish political front in Syria. It is pleasing to see that your anti-pyd position has somewhat softened and your reporting of Rojava although not without some bias (all journalists have their own opinion) is more reflective of the reality.
The Kurds in syria have been fighting with extermist since the beginning of bloody conflict.The have protected their people and other etnicities,christians.They did not receive any help from world.it is not a strange !,the welt powers awarded them by blocking their delegation to Geneva2.
Comment Policy
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.